India viewed RCEP an obstacle to its export and a new gateway for imports from China. Xenophobia loomed large as India will act a buying market. It is the fourth largest market in the trade block. As it is a China backed free trade block, it will have larger stake in decision making. India has widest trade deficit with China. India’s participation in the trade block will accelerate China’s export with the duty free entry facilities.

China does not have FTA with India. RCEP would have been a new gateway for China’s duty free entry in India, had India joined it. So far, China made backdoor entry through its ASEAN-China FTA. India alleged that the Rules of Origin in RCEP was loose and has not taken much care to check the abuse of value addition norm, which is likely to be perpetuated by China. Trade deficit is another issue which was not addressed. India was disappointed for not opening the IT sector in the block.

India has FTAs with many of the member countries in RCEP, such as ASEAN, Japan and South Korea. But, in none of the deals, India could enjoy windfalls. Evidences show that India faced larger flow of imports from these countries, in particular ASEAN in the post FTA, which damaged its domestic industries. This triggered vehement protest against RCEP.

For years, India shot down FTA with USA. USA was eager and India was cool. Former US Ambassador to India Kennth Juster mulled FTA with India. Situation made a voltae-face, after USA became the biggest trading partner of India in 2018-19. Hitherto, China was the biggest trading partner of India for over five years. The difference was that while trade buoyancy with USA was driven by India exporting more and importing less, in case of China it was more import by India and less export to China.

This demonstrates that FTA with USA would be more beneficial for India. Export has become imperative to rejuvenate the economy in Modi 2 period. India targets US$ 5 trillion economy by 2024-25. To achieve this, India targeted export at US $ 660 billion by 2024-25. To this end, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal’s endeavour to embrace new trade deal with USA is justified, despite several niggling issues. In US-India Strategic Partnership Forum, he decoded that both countries have agreed to broad contours of proposed trade packages, after closing the pending gaps.

India was embroiled in trade confrontation during Trump regime. USA’s withdrawal of GSP benefits and high tariffs on steel and aluminium were hyped to dent the heyday of India-US trade relation. Notwithstanding, its export to USA rose in 2019-20.

Basket of exports to USA is another important parameter which edge out the other nations with whom India has FTAS. USA is the biggest importer of ready made garments, marine products, diamonds, which generate big employment in the country. Both World Bank and Peterson Institutes studies have predicted significant gains for both USA and India, if a free trade agreement is concluded. In addition, USA is the biggest importer of India IT services.

Given these, ethical wisdom suggests that India should advocate FTA with USA. This will not only bring two countries closer to each other, but will also dilute the trade confrontation which erupted during Trump administration. Further, USA- India FTA will leverage a greater scope for India’s exports to USA against stiff competition from member countries, had USA rejoins FTA.

Export of garment is a case in point. Textile, including garment, is the single major item of India’s export. USA alone accounts for 40 percent of India’s total export of textiles. Vietnam, as a member of TPP, is the toughest competitor to India. It is the second biggest exporter of readymade garments to USA (after China). Against this backdrop, India’s FTA with USA will largely dilute Vietnamese trade competitiveness to USA.

With tariffs done away under FTA, trade related investment will witness a better scope. USA has the advantages of technology and financial muscles and India has an edge in providing low cost production base and big domestic demand. FTA will encourage US investors to invest in India in lure of low cost production, while importing high tech products duty free as inputs. Eventually, it will help in reducing trade deficit.

Even though President-elect Joe Biden did not mention any plan to rejoin TPP (Tans - Pacific Partnership) during his Presidential election campaign, it does not mean that he may not have a second thought on it. During Obama Presidency, he, as Vice President, was an active promoter of TPP. In his election campaign he warned that “either China is going to write rules of the road for 21st century on trade or are we”. President Donald Trump too, after a year of exiting from TPP, pondered to rejoin the trade block. (IPA Service)