View Articles

Increase in the number of the cases of COVID-19 in India is a worrying factor even though it is on the expected lines as predicted by several epidemiologists. While Delhi has shown some downward trend, other states have now been showing rising numbers. Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana, Himachal and some areas in North East are having increasing number of cases. This has added to the overall number of cases country wide. Vaccine is long awaited. But the vaccines have to pass through several trials before they are put to use on human population in large number. Since the infection of Corona is not age specific, the vaccine has to be given to each and every person. This in itself is a huge task which involves production, distribution and then inoculation in such large numbers. It is not yet certain up to what duration the vaccine will provide immunity to the individual.

The Independence Day address delivered by the Prime Minister was typical of the Modi style. It was long, rhetorical, and at times dramatic. An 86 minutes long speech can naturally accommodate various sorts of flavour as desired by the speaker. Tall claims were aplenty, along with the colourful narration of achievements. The Prime Minister was visibly conscious about the huge size of the audience, likely to listen to his speech. The tone of the speech was set in a way that was meant to cover up the gigantic failures of a government that has been proven a non performing one. The BJP's promise in the beginning was maximum governance, with minimum government. In course of last six years what the country could witness was just opposite, minimum governance and maximum government!

The prime minister’s speech on Independence Day was watched with anticipation to see if he would announce any new initiatives to deal with the health crisis caused by the pandemic and the related economic crisis which has resulted in large-scale loss of jobs and livelihoods.

Finally, the one month political crisis of Rajasthan, amid the ongoing Corona crisis, came to an end with rebel Sachin Pilot ending his battle against his own party and settling for peace with his detractor chief minister Ashok Gehlot as of now. Due to the revolt, Pilot was even removed from the posts of both deputy president of the party and deputy chief minister. Now, it remains to be seen whether he will be given the same posts again.

We have large number of historical facts to show how the feudal lords and aristocrats for maintaining the façade of their power and aristocracy borrowed money from the traders by pledging their property. But this proved to be illusive and eventually they failed to resurrect their pride and prejudice.

New Delhi: Debutant Sudeva will have an “all Indian XI” in the forthcoming Hero I-League 2020-21.

New Delhi: In a rare gesture Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday wrote a heartwarming two-page letter to former wicketkeeper captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni in which he lavished praise on the retired cricketer saying "Looking at you as just a sportsperson would be Injustice'.

Kamala Harris is now the first Black woman and the first person of Indian descent to run for national office for a major political party in the U.S., the League of Conservation Voters (LCV) pointed out. She also has a strong legacy of championing environmental justice throughout her career.

Senior Supreme Court advocate and activist Prashant Bhushan came out of the Supreme Court on Thursday taller after the hearing on the fixation of his sentence. His principled exposition of the purpose behind his two controversial tweets in the course of this crucial hearing, won the heart of the battle though the bench stuck to its position on holding him guilty for contempt and gave him two-three days to change his statement.

“I speak my mind and therefore I am,” began Ms Indira Jaising. In her address, she drew a parallel between the life in pandemic and a life without the right to freedom of speech and expression. “If there is a cessation of the right to express ourselves then we will be pushed into less than human existence”, she stated, adding that the courts were to entertain PILs. According to her, any matter that affected public interest gave the right to the citizens to question the Court. On multiple occasions, however, the Court had passed judgments in “public interest”, even though the process leading to such a judgment did not include the public or their opinions.