CJI RECUSAL AMOUNTS TO RUNNING AWAY FROM CRUCIAL JUDICIAL LEADERSHIP ROLE
ELECTION COMMISSION CASE HAS FAR-REACHING IMPLICATIONS FOR DEMOCRACY
2024-12-04 11:42
-
Impartiality in decision-making is regarded as the cornerstone of a fair and just legal system. Judges are expected to set aside personal beliefs, biases, and prejudices in order to apply the law objectively, ensuring that their decisions are based solely on the facts presented before them. The decision by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna to recuse himself from hearing petitions challenging the exclusion of Chief Justices of India (CJIs) from the panel selecting the Chief Election Commissioner must lead to a debate on the nature of judicial recusal and the impact of personal beliefs on court decisions. While recusal is a necessary and sometimes unavoidable mechanism to preserve the integrity of the judicial process, it raises important questions about the role of personal biases and judicial conscience in high-stakes cases.